The ongoing pandemic has had a major impact on the global economy and has resulted in governments around the world introducing various measures to improve their economies. However, this has also led to an increase in public sector borrowing, which has been a concern for many policymakers. This issue has been recently highlighted by the Chancellor in a statement, wherein he has blamed the eye-watering sums spent on pandemic and energy bills for the increase in public sector borrowing. In this essay, we will discuss the legal aspects of public sector borrowing in the context of any country.
Public sector borrowing refers to the amount of money that the government borrows from the financial market to meet its expenses such as infrastructure development, healthcare, education, welfare programs, and other operational expenses. Borrowing money from the market is a common practice among governments to finance their expenditures. Governments issue bonds to borrow money from the financial market to finance their expenses.
In any country, public sector borrowing is governed by laws and regulations that aim to maintain financial stability and ensure that the government is accountable for its actions. One such law is the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act (FRBM) that was passed in India in 2003. This law aims to provide a legal framework for the management of public finances and to improve fiscal discipline.
The FRBM Act requires the government to set targets for reducing the fiscal deficit and public debt. The government is required to submit a report to the parliament every year that outlines its fiscal policies and the progress made towards achieving its targets. This report is reviewed by the parliamentary committee on finance.
The FRBM Act also imposes restrictions on the government's borrowing activities. The government is required to limit its borrowing to a certain percentage of GDP. This limit is set to ensure that the government does not borrow too much and thereby compromise its ability to repay its debts. Furthermore, the government is required to maintain a certain level of cash reserve to meet any unforeseen expenses.
In any country, public sector borrowing has its advantages and disadvantages. One of the advantages of borrowing is that it allows the government to finance its activities without raising taxes. Borrowing also allows governments to invest in infrastructure development, which can contribute to long-term economic growth. However, public sector borrowing also has its disadvantages. When governments borrow, they have to repay the borrowed amount along with interest. This can put a strain on public finances and may result in an increase in taxes in the future. Furthermore, too much borrowing can lead to inflation as the increased demand for money can cause its value to decrease.
In the context of the Chancellor's statement, it is clear that public sector borrowing has increased due to the pandemic and energy bills. In any country, the pandemic has forced governments to spend more money on healthcare, welfare programs, and other relief measures. This has resulted in an increase in public sector borrowing. Furthermore, the rise in energy bills has put additional pressure on public finances.
In conclusion, public sector borrowing is an important tool for governments to finance their expenses. However, it is important to maintain fiscal discipline and follow the laws and regulations governing public sector borrowing. Any government that borrows too much can put a strain on its finances and compromise its ability to repay its debts. In the current context of the pandemic and energy bills, governments need to be cautious in their borrowing activities and take steps to maintain financial stability.
Need legal advice? Contact Best Lawyers in Chandigarh